Is there a Psy-Op campaign aiming at brainwashing Americans about the hypes of a war with Russia? Did anyone question why the US will risk its soldiers and spend Billions of dollars to support Ukraine? Did anyone ask what are out interests in Ukraine in the first place? Haven’t we learned anything from Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria? Are we bound to make the same mistake all over again??? But Russia is no Iraq.
The trajectory of the US-Russian rivalry is taking an unknown destination.
One thing is sure: the annexation of Crimea, the provision of military support to Syria, the sale of advanced missile systems, S-400 and S-300 to Turkey and Iran respectively, and the rapprochement between Moscow and Beijing suggest what an unpredictable Russia can do in a world already marked by titanic geopolitical shifts, political upheavals, instability, and shifting alliances. It will not surprise me when President Putin’s next strategic move is to consider amendments to, or even the cancellation of, the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) and the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) with the US. The US and the Russian Federation have agreed to extend the treaty through February 4, 2026. Should this scenario become a reality, it will be a game-changer.
Wake up Americans!!!!
David
Ukraine came out and said Navalny's death wasn't in fact Putin (as Biden and the US Policy makers were so quick to decry)! David & Elizabeth react to the news in this short reaction video!
This class was taught LIVE on November 8, 2023, at 06:00 PM CT (-6GMT)
The Hidden Machinery: America's Foreign & Military Affairs Exposed.
Steel yourself for an unflinching deep dive into the clandestine mechanics of US foreign and military policy. Have you ever pondered how decisions that impact millions, both domestically and globally, are truly made?
In this electrifying chapter, we tear apart the polished façade of diplomacy to reveal the shadowy interplay of interests, agendas, and power games that shape America's moves on the global chessboard.
As we journey through the intricate maze of foreign policy, you'll confront pressing questions that demand answers: Is there a clear, consistent strategy steering the ship of state, or are we adrift, pushed and pulled by the undercurrents of vested interests, secret pacts, and hidden allegiances?
Explore the controversial realms of the military-industrial complex—a symbiotic behemoth where industry, military, and politics collide in a ...
Media Manipulation: The Silent Puppeteer of the American Psyche.
Ever feel like the stories you see and hear are crafted more for theater than truth? That there's a script behind the "breaking news"?
In this incendiary chapter, we pull back the curtain on the media's metamorphosis from its role as the "Fourth Estate" - a watchdog of democracy - to its current avatar as a powerful player with vested interests and hidden agendas.
Dive deep into the murky waters of media evolution, from objective reporting to sensationalism, from public service to profit-driven enterprises.
Unearth the tactical maneuvering of media platforms that, under the guise of delivering news, often serve tailored narratives designed to sway, to incite, and sometimes, to mislead blatantly.
Arm yourself with knowledge as we dissect the machinations of this colossal industry, revealing its strategies to capture your attention, mold your perceptions, and dictate the national conversation.
This chapter isn't ...
BEIJING, Nov. 24 (Xinhua) -- Chinese President Xi Jinping on Monday clarified China's principled position on the Taiwan issue in a telephone call with his U.S. counterpart, Donald Trump.
Xi stressed that Taiwan's return to China is an important part of the post-war international order.
Why Xi phoned Trump all the sudden?
AIMHO.
From Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on November 24, 2025:
Mao Ning: China has articulated its position multiple times on Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s erroneous remarks on Taiwan. Those remarks seriously violate the principles laid down in the four political documents between China and Japan, and has fundamentally eroded the political foundation of China-Japan relations.
We’ve noted the Japanese side’s reference to Japan’s “consistent position” on the Taiwan question. But what exactly do they mean by this so-called “consistent position?” Can Japan articulate this “consistent position” in its entirety to the public? If Japan merely keeps repeating that its position has not changed without specifying what that position is and meanwhile keeps crossing the line, then this kind of repetition means nothing but empty words, and simply fudges and hollows out the one-China position.
The one-China principle is an unshakable...